Jump to content
Notice Board
  • Great Deals
  • To post a recruitment query in the "Recruitment Areas" or in the "Force Specific Areas" you will require a Recruitment Pass or a Membership Package. Click HERE to read more.
  • Get your very own website designed by our in-house team at RAW Digital Media. Get 25% off all quotes using reference "RAW25" Prices start at just £199 Click HERE to read more.
  • Website hosting packages start from just £59 p/year Click HERE to read more.
Sign in to follow this  
Chief Bakes

BBC: Senate committee questions Trump nuclear authority

Recommended Posts

Chief Bakes

Senate committee questions Trump nuclear authority

The Minot Air Force Base houses part of the US arsenal of Minuteman Intercontinential Ballistic Missiles.Image copyright Getty Images
Image caption The Minot Air Force Base houses part of the US arsenal of Minuteman Intercontinential Ballistic Missiles

For the first time in over 40 years, Congress is examining a US president's authority to launch a nuclear attack.

The Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing is titled Authority to Order the Use of Nuclear Weapons.

The panel's Republican chairman accused President Trump last month of setting the US "on a path to World War III".

In August, Mr Trump vowed to unleash "fire and fury like the world has never seen" on North Korea if it continued to expand its atomic weapons programme.

Trump and the nuclear codes

Bob Corker says Trump 'utterly untruthful president'

The last time Congress debated this issue was over a four-day hearing in March 1976.

A nervous laugh

Senator Chris Murphy, a Connecticut Democrat, explained the reason for Tuesday's public hearing.

"We are concerned that the president is so unstable, is so volatile, has a decision-making process that is so quixotic, that he might order a nuclear-weapons strike that is wildly out of step with US national-security interests."

Senators also wanted to know what would happen if the president ordered a nuclear strike.

Robert Kehler, an ex-commander of US Strategic Command, said that in his former role he would have followed the president's order to carry out the strike - if it were legal.

Mr Kehler said if he were uncertain about its legality, he would consult with his own advisers.

Under certain circumstances, he explained: "I would have said, 'I'm not ready to proceed.'"

One senator, Ron Johnson, a Republican from Wisconsin, asked: "Then what happens?"

Mr Kehler admitted: "I don't know."

People in the room laughed.

But the BBC's Tara McKelvey, who attended the hearing, said it was a nervous laugh.

What else can we expect from the hearing?

No Trump administration officials are testifying before the hearing, which is examining the nuclear command and control structure that has served all US presidents.

Discussion about the highly classified process of actually launching an attack is unlikely in such a public forum.

The hearing is being closely watched, not only due to the grave nature of the topic, but also because of Mr Trump's vocal critics on the panel - some of whom come from the Republican president's own party.

Bob Corker, the Tennessee senator who chairs the committee, last month engaged in a Twitter spat with Mr Trump, likening the White House to "an adult day care centre".

Another senator on the panel has drafted legislation proposing to curb the president's power to launch a nuclear attack.

Media playback is unsupported on your device
Media captionLashing out: What Bob Corker really thinks of President Trump

The bill by Edward Markey, a Massachusetts Democrat, would require Mr Trump to obtain a declaration of war from Congress before launching a nuclear first-strike.

Despite rallying 13 co-sponsors in the Senate, the measure has no Republican support and has gained little traction.

Can Trump launch a nuclear attack?

As commander-in-chief, the president has the sole authority to order a nuclear attack, which can be delivered either by submarine, airplane, or intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) - which make up the so-called "nuclear triad".

Under current rules, the US president could set a strike in motion by entering the codes into a device called "the football", which travels everywhere with the president.

Mr Trump is not required to consult anyone or gain consensus from any other members of government.

His top advisers, such as Defence Secretary James Mattis, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson or national security adviser Lt Gen HR McMaster play no role in the chain of command.

Congressional approval is required for the use of conventional military force, but nuclear powers have remained within the president's authority since the dawn of the nuclear age.

This is because an enemy ballistic missile launched from the other side of the world could hit the US in barely 30 minutes.

View the full article

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Member Achievements

Cathedral Bobby

Please confiscate his nuclear football and give him one that like himself is full of air and needs kicking from one end of the field to the other

  • Like 1

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Member Achievements

Zulu 22

And yet the American electoral system voted him into office. I often wondered how the person with the fewer votes could be returned but, it is their system. However I am sure that there are many Americans who are wondering just what they did vote for.

I am even more alarmed that I am agreeing with Cathedral, again. I must go for treatment.:)

Many Presidents have been equally dangerous. I attended a lecture the other day on "Who killed Dr. Kelly" It posed many questions but left you in no doubt that there was an understanding between Blair and George Bush which to prvail had to erase the findings and knowledge of Dr. Kelly. Despite the Hutton report, which was denied huge parts of evidence, the Inquest into Dr Kelly has not been held over 15 years since his death. G. Bush had the same nuclear responsibility as Trump!


Edited by Zulu 22
  • Haha 1

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Member Achievements

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

About us

Police Community was originally founded in 2014 by two serving Police Officers.

In 2016 it was incorporated as a limited company called RAW Digital Media Limited and then purchased 3 other forums; Police Specials, UK Police Online and Police UK to form the largest policing discussion forum network in the UK.

Get in touch

  • 20-22 Wenlock Road, London N1 7GU
  • contact@rawdigitalmedia.co.uk
  • 0844 357 0111
  • Forums In Our Group - Police.Community - UKPoliceOnline.CO.UK - PoliceSpecials.COM - PoliceUK.COM



    Meet The Team

  • Chief Bakes
    Chief Bakes Management
  • Chief Rat
    Chief Rat Management
  • Chief Cheetah
    Chief Cheetah Management
  • Rocket
    Rocket Global Moderators
  • David
    David Global Moderators
  • Devil
    Devil Global Moderators
  • MindTheGap
    MindTheGap Global Moderators
  • Sir Penguin
    Sir Penguin Global Moderators
  • Remmy
    Remmy Global Moderators
  • Fedster
    Fedster Global Moderators