AmIObligedtoAnswerThat 62 Posted April 10, 2015 Share Posted April 10, 2015 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Management Chief Cheetah 6,915 Posted April 10, 2015 Management Share Posted April 10, 2015 That has to be one of the most boring un-eventful police related videos of all time. I do feel sorry for some of the spectators that they are unable to buy thick enough tinfoil to construct their hats out of though. Anybody know the full story behind it? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AmIObligedtoAnswerThat 62 Posted April 10, 2015 Author Share Posted April 10, 2015 That has to be one of the most boring un-eventful police related videos of all time. I do feel sorry for some of the spectators that they are unable to buy thick enough tinfoil to construct their hats out of though. Anybody know the full story behind it? (I think) the guy who owned the property owed the council business rates or something like that. What powers are there in relation to police getting involved in evictions? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SW_matt 55 Posted April 11, 2015 Share Posted April 11, 2015 (edited) (I think) the guy who owned the property owed the council business rates or something like that. What powers are there in relation to police getting involved in evictions? Removal of trespassers? I think but may well be mistaken Edited April 11, 2015 by SW_matt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cs! + 88 Posted April 11, 2015 Share Posted April 11, 2015 Removal of trespassers? I think but may well be mistakenPossibly, under section 114 of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012, Offence of squatting in a residential building. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SW_matt 55 Posted April 13, 2015 Share Posted April 13, 2015 Possibly, under section 114 of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012, Offence of squatting in a residential building. No that wouldn't apply because at the time they entered the property as tenants they were not trespassers and it was not adverse to the owner so cannot be adverse possession. I think there is a case that gives a common law power to remove trespassers 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now