Jump to content
×
×
  • Create New...

IOPC to issue stop and search advice


Recommended Posts

Fedster

Frontline officers are to get advice from the conduct watchdog on handling stop and searches with BAME people following an investigation of a case in Cambridgeshire.

image.png.05473d86fc1e400a478e2880a8d4f8e1.png

Date - 7th June 2021
By - Chris Smith

Guidance is set to be issued to officers in a bid to reduce the number of complaints linked to stop by and search.

The Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) is creating a best practice code to enable frontline officers avoid problem contacts from improper use of the tactic.

The new guidance emerges as part of a verdict on a case involving Cambridgeshire Constabulary when a black motorist was stopped and made an accusation of racial proifiling. The IOPC found no misconduct by any officer involved in the stop although one is to receive diversity training.  

The IOPC said in a statement following the investigation: "We are currently working on national learning recommendations in relation to stop and search. As part of this, we are looking at how traffic stops are recorded and how the police can avoid using intelligence in a way that is discriminatory. Our work on this has been informed by the findings of this investigation and will be published in due course." 

The complaint followed an incident in Ely in March 2015 when a driver was stopped and questioned.

The force referred itself to the IOPC in June last year when a video clip of the incident was shared on social media.

The investigation found that whilst the officers involved did have some local intelligence on which the decision to stop the complainant was based, this intelligence was seven months old and the description of the people of concern was no more specific than ‘Black men’. Other factors, such as the demographics of the area and the fact it was known for drug dealing, were not specific to the man being stopped.

The complainant was not searched or arrested.

It was accepted by the IOPC that the officer had acted in good faith for a legitimate policing purpose. He had apologised for the upset caused to the man and acknowledged that he could have provided a clearer explanation at the time.    

The IOPC said the officer should reflect on whether the intelligence justified the stop, why it could be seen as discrimination and the impact it had on the man involved.

A second officer was found to have no case to answer as the complainant did not believe he was present during the conversation.

IOPC Regional Director Graham Beesley said: “This incident rightly raised concerns about public confidence in policing and not least from the Black community.

“We examined the stop and found that there was room for improvement in some of the interactions with the man, who was justified in querying why he was told that he was stopped on the grounds of his race.”

View On Police Oracle

Link to post
Share on other sites
skydiver

12 months to investigate that is taking the mickey but is par for the course from the IOPC and even then they found nothing wrong but in desperate attempt to justify  their existence they managed to squeeze out a meager amount of teaching.  They would be much better off concentrating on the speed of their investigations and their decision making skills.  Police PSD departments regularly leave them looking flat footed and slothful in their approach to investigations  whilst their success in terms of court results seems embarrassing.   They are 0 for 4 in terms of Hillsborough prosecutions but you wouldn't know that from them.

Link to post
Share on other sites
BizzieBee

Spoiler Alert: Don’t stop black people. This section of the community don’t commit crimes. If you do stop one, you’re a racist. 

Just when you think the IOPC couldn’t get any worse and complicit in the U.K. mass-murder killing spree. 

Jesus H. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Indiana Jones
1 hour ago, skydiver said:

12 months to investigate that is taking the mickey

Not just 12 months to investigate, but also it was six years ago! They're really trying to eke out a living with this rubbish.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Radman

I'm holding my breath in great anticipation on hearing this advice... 🙄

Link to post
Share on other sites
Zulu 22

The last ones to give any advice in practical Policing is the IOPC. Why did the Force see fit to refer the case to the Incompetent Office for Police Complaints. That smacks of pathetic leadership to be deplored by serving officer.

Link to post
Share on other sites
SimonT

I have to review my teams searches which is very easy because they don't do them. There is no incentive to stop and search and there are always other things to do. So they do them. 

It's s pretty good system. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Police Community is a forum that is supported financially through advertisements. It is a breach of our standard use policy to use Adblock plugins/software on our site. 

In order to continue using our site you will need to disable Adblock across our site. Alternatively you can purchase a membership package from our online store to remove adverts as part of the membership subscription. 

https://police.community/remove-adverts/

Thank you for your support.

I have disabled Adblock