Fedster + 1,307 Posted August 4, 2020 Share Posted August 4, 2020 A Metropolitan Police Chief Superintendent has had misconduct allegations proven against him after forming a personal relationship with a PC he was mentoring that he failed to disclose. Date - 3rd August 2020 By - Chloe Livadeas Ch Supt Rob Atkin MBE, commander for the South East, had some of the allegations proven against him at a misconduct hearing on Friday 31 July and will now receive “management advice”. In October 2015, Ch Supt Atkin was appointed as mentor to a constable who was a candidate for accelerated promotion. Between August 2017 and May 2018 the relationship became “personal”, the force said in a statement. It was alleged that during their personal relationship, Ch Supt Atkin abused his position to promote her professional development through postings and promotion opportunities and failed to tell management about their relationship. While assisting in the 2018 fast track promotion assessments, Ch Supt Atkin was sent confidential assessment papers and a list of candidates. It was alleged that he failed to disclose that the constable he was in a personal relationship with was on the list of candidates and failed to declare a conflict of interest. It was also alleged he showed her the assessment papers with the intention of providing her with an unfair advantage. The panel concluded that it was proven in part that Ch Supt Atkin breached the standards of professional behaviour in respect of authority, respect and courtesy, and this was at the level of misconduct. The panel found he acted within his role as mentor and had not gained anything from promoting the officer’s professional development or “had a bad purpose in mind” by doing so. He did fail to inform line managers of their relationship. The panel concluded that it was proven in part that Ch Supt Atkin breached the standards of professional behaviour in respect of confidentiality and this was at the level of misconduct. They found the female officer did see the papers but it was not proven that Ch Supt Atkin allowed that to happen or that he was attempting to provide her with an unfair advantage. They also did not find it proven that Ch Supt Atkin failed to declare a conflict of interest. It was accepted Ch Supt Atkin did not notify the College of Policing that the officer had seen the papers. The panel decided Ch Supt Atkin made “unwise decisions and showed poor judgement” rather than displaying deliberate wrong-doing and therefore the breaches proven were at the level of misconduct and not gross misconduct. View On Police Oracle Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!Register a new account
Already have an account? Sign in here.Sign In Now