Jump to content

Justice Secretary rejects claims Police Scotland will run out of cash for wages


Recommended Posts

But federation warns loss of local authority funding could see 1,000 less officers.

Thinning blue line?: SPF general secretary Calum Steele raises fears of less officers next year

Thinning blue line?: SPF general secretary Calum Steele raises fears of less officers next year

Date - 15th October 2019
By - Nick Hudson - Police Oracle


The Scottish government has played down “outrageous” claims Britain’s second largest force is running out of cash and could lose up to 1,000 officers next year.

The Scottish Police Federation insists the national force is "in a really precarious position", raising fears that officers’ wages could not be paid after February next year.

SPF general secretary Calum Steele officers faced the “debilitating” impact of working in crumbling buildings and the “demoralising” effect of driving around in "sooty diesels that are barely able to be kept on the road", while some detectives do not have access to a police vehicle.

Police Scotland needs £300 million in capital funding to bring its police stations and estate up to legal standards, he told the SNP conference in Aberdeen.

He also said some senior investigating officers have to deal with an ongoing case load of 100 rapes and sexual assault allegations.

But Scotland's Justice Secretary Humza Yousaf hit back, branding the suggestions "outrageous" and untrue.

Mr Yousaf, speaking at a conference fringe event, said: "If police officers are not paid in February, I will not just eat my own hat, I will eat every conference delegate's hat that is in this room.

“Because that just simply will not happen."

The comments by the federation come after Police Scotland Chief Constable Iain Livingstone warned in August that the number of officers the force had was "not sustainable".

Mr Steele said the chief constable had warned 750 officers could be cut, and added: "That is before the doubts over an additional 300 officers that are currently funded by local authorities comes into it.

"If local authorities withdraw their funding for those 300 officers, Scotland will lose 1,000 police officers next year, unless there is a change in funding.

"At this point in time the police service of Scotland is going to run out of money and not be able to pay wages in February. That is the reality of what is facing the police service."

Mr Steele said that while Police Scotland is the second largest force in the UK – and covers the largest geographical area – it has the fifth smallest capital budget.

"The simple truth is we need round about £300 million in capital to bring our buildings and estate up to a legal standard," he said.

"We are currently spending less than half the money we need each year to maintain our vehicles.

"You think of the debilitating impact of being a police officer turning up to work, and the building you're working in is crumbling around you. You think of the demoralising effect of getting into a vehicle which is decrepit or falling apart.

"No point lauding green targets or reducing emissions if we're running around in sooty diesels that are barely able to be kept on the road.

"We have senior investigating officers in some parts of our country that are managing case loads on an ongoing basis of round about 100 rapes and sexual assaults. That is a ridiculous case load for senior investigating officers to be carrying.

"We have detectives that don't have access to cars, they don't have access to the technological support they require."

Mr Yousaf said he would "listen with an open mind" to requests from the police for additional capital funding, pointing out that Police Scotland received a 52 per cent increase last year.

He stressed the SNP administration in Edinburgh had "purposely taken a very different direction to the Tory Government in Westminster of the last decade", increasing officer numbers by more than 1,000 after it was first elected to power in 2007.

The Justice Secretary said: "Calum wouldn't be doing his job if he wasn't pressuring the Government for more funding and more finance, and he has every right to do that."

He also insisted he could not envisage Police Scotland having to reduce officer numbers by 750.

Mr Yousaf said numbers could not be reduced unless an increase in operational capacity could be demonstrated.

He concluded: "That has simply not been demonstrated, certainly not to the numbers suggested by Calum here today.

"I am very confident of this, certainly as far as I can see in the foreseeable future, there will not be a reduction of 750 officers. I do not envisage that happening."

View On Police Oracle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your future is safe with the SNP, or is it. I do not think that Scotland's future is safe in their hands. When the obvious is pointed out by The Scottish Police Federation just ignore them, very similar to Mrs May when she was Home Secretary but the pigeons are coming home to roost. We all know what has happened since she rubbished the PFEW.

Edited by Zulu 22
Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be fair the Scottish Police Federation is seemingly very politicised, the proposed merger of BTP into PolScotland showed up the Scottish Fed in this regard. 

The SNP has been disastrous for Scottish policing, it has done all it can to centralise policing North of the Border bringing it further into the fold of politics. 

I often think the only good which came from the merger of Scottish regional forces with the creation of Police Scotland saved England & Wales from a similar fate. 

Little Kingdom mindsets, community focused and ultimately led policing isn't a bad thing, centralisation in my opinion has led to a disjointed form of policing with what local communities expect from the police to what is actually delivered. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Scottish assembly is so similar to Parliament as they both completely ignore the opinion of the Police Federation, why, because the SPF and the PFEW do not say what they want to hear, those obvious shortfalls which might just cost money. I agree that the merger of Forces in Scotland highlighted to England and Wales the complete disaster of such a move.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With no subsidies from Westminster, I wonder how it will be funded should Ms Sturgeon's obsession for an independent Scotland wins out?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, David said:

With no subsidies from Westminster, I wonder how it will be funded should Ms Sturgeon's obsession for an independent Scotland wins out?

It will not last for long as the Scottish finance is held up by the, rather inordinate, financial support from Westminster through the financial formula's used.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Create New...