Jump to content
Notice Board
  • Great Deals
  • To post a recruitment query in the "Recruitment Areas" or in the "Force Specific Areas" you will require a Recruitment Pass or a Membership Package. Click HERE to read more.
  • Get your very own website designed by our in-house team at RAW Digital Media. Get 25% off all quotes using reference "RAW25" Prices start at just £199 Click HERE to read more.
  • Website hosting packages start from just £59 p/year Click HERE to read more.
Chief Bakes

BBC: Heterosexual couple lose civil partnership challenge

Recommended Posts

Chief Bakes

Heterosexual couple lose civil partnership challenge

  • 21 February 2017
  • From the section UK
Media captionRebecca Steinfeld and Charles Keidan: "There's everything to fight for"

A heterosexual couple have lost their Court of Appeal battle to have a civil partnership instead of a marriage.

Rebecca Steinfeld and Charles Keidan, from London, challenged a ruling that said they did not meet the legal requirement of being the same sex.

The judges said there was a potential breach of their human rights, but the government should have more time to decide the future of civil partnership.

The couple said there was still "everything to fight for".

They intend to appeal to the Supreme Court.

A government spokesman said it welcomed the ruling and would take the judgement into account during its evaluation of civil partnerships.

Why choose civil partnership over marriage?

The BBC's legal affairs correspondent Clive Coleman said the couple had lost by the "narrowest of margins".

Our correspondent said: "The government's 'wait and see' policy, which is based on looking at the take-up of same-sex civil partnerships, was found by Lady Justice Arden not to be not good enough to address the discrimination faced by heterosexual couples.

"However, her fellow judges were prepared to let the government have a little more time and so the case was lost on that issue alone."

'Equality and choice'

Image copyright Kate Stewart

Kate Stewart and Matthew Cole, 46, decided to get a civil partnership in Gibraltar, a British Overseas Territory, in June 2016, after deciding marriage was not for them.

"Matthew and I didn't feel that marriage reflected our relationship," said Dr Stewart, from Derby.

"The institution [of marriage] is very much unequal depending on your religion.

"We therefore felt it wasn't a status we were comfortable with because it still had hangovers of inequality from the past."

Dr Stewart, 48, said although they believed marriage was right for some couples, it was about having the choice.

They wanted recognition of their relationship after 10 years together, although their civil partnership is still not legally recognised in the UK.

"We paid for the ceremony in pounds, we have a certificate, it was all very British, but as soon as we were back home we didn't have legal recognition," Dr Stewart said.

"The declaration that we were both each other's partner was quite moving... we were on an equal footing. It was surprisingly touching."

Ms Steinfeld, 35, and Mr Keidan, 40, want to secure legal recognition of their seven-year relationship but do not consider marriage suitable for them.

The couple, who have a 20-month-old daughter, have said they want to formalise their relationship within a social institution "which is modern, which is symmetrical and that focuses on equality, which is exactly what a civil partnership is".

"We lost on a technicality," Ms Steinfeld said.

"So there's everything to fight for, and much in the ruling that gives us reason to be positive and keep going."

Dan Squires, QC for the secretary of state for education, who has responsibility for equalities within government, said it had been decided at this stage not to extend civil partnerships to opposite-sex couples, or to either abolish or phase them out.

Instead, he said the government planned to see how extending marriage to same-sex couples impacted on civil partnerships before making a final decision.

All three judges agreed that the status quo could not continue indefinitely.

'Close the loophole'

Human rights campaigner Peter Tatchell, who supported Ms Steinfeld and Mr Keidan in court, said the ruling was "a defeat for love and equality".

"It cannot be right that lesbian and gay couples have two options, civil partnership and civil marriage; whereas opposite-sex partners have only one option, marriage," he said.

Education campaigner and journalist Fiona Millar, who has been in a relationship with journalist Alastair Campbell for 35 years, told the court they had chosen not to get married "on principle".

After the ruling, she said she was "one of thousands and thousands" of people in the UK who will be waiting for the government to "close the civil partnerships loophole by making them available to all".

How do same-sex marriage and civil partnership compare?

Image copyright Getty Images
  • Equal legal treatment in matters including inheritance, tax, pensions and next-of-kin arrangements
  • Rules for the dissolution of a civil partnership are the same as those for marriage, except that adultery cannot be used as evidence
  • In a civil ceremony there is no requirement to exchange vows and while you can include readings, songs or music, there must be no religious component
  • Partnership can be conducted in private, whereas marriage ceremonies must be public and can be conducted by clergy
  • Marriage certificates include the names of only the fathers of the parties. Civil partnership certificates include the names of both parents

Conservative MP Tim Loughton, who recently introduced a Private Member's Bill to give mixed-sex couples the right to a civil partnership, said the government had "no excuse" for delaying a change in the law as the bill received cross-party backing.

MPs are due to debate the bill on 24 March.

Lorely Burt, Liberal Democrat spokesperson for equalities, said the verdict was a "slap in the face" to mixed sex couples who want a civil partnership.

Since the start of the campaign by Ms Steinfeld and Mr Keidan, more than 72,000 people have signed an online petition calling for civil partnerships to be open to all.

The Same Sex Couples Marriage Act extended the right to marry to gay couples in England and Wales in 2014, allowing same-sex couples to choose between civil partnership and marriage.

In 2013, there were 5,646 civil partnerships in England and Wales, but this fell by 85% in the following two years and in 2015, there were 861 couples who opted for civil partnerships over marriage.

In July 2016, the Isle of Man became the only part of the British Isles where both gay and straight couples can enter civil partnerships.

London couple Claire Beale, 49, and Martin Loat, 55, became the first UK couple to take advantage of the legislation in the British Crown Dependency last year, but their partnership is not legally recognised in the UK.

Are you a heterosexual couple who would like to undertake a civil partnership? What do you think about the ruling against civil partnerships for heterosexual couples? Tell us your experiences by emailing haveyoursay@bbc.co.uk

You can also contact us in the following ways:

Downsizing - 38884601

Or use the form below

Your contact details

If you are happy to be contacted by a BBC journalist please leave a telephone number that we can contact you on. In some cases a selection of your comments will be published, displaying your name as you provide it and location, unless you state otherwise. Your contact details will never be published. When sending us pictures, video or eyewitness accounts at no time should you endanger yourself or others, take any unnecessary risks or infringe any laws. Please ensure you have read the terms and conditions.

Terms and conditions

View the full article

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Member Achievements


I don't see why straight people shouldn't be able to enter into a civil partnership?

It seems inequitable that gays can do it but straights can't.

I don't have a particular respect for the institution of marriage. It has so much baggage attached it, so many outdated preconceptions and is intertwined with religious dogma.

I would never get married but I would consider a civil partnership with the right person.

Sent from my iPhone usring Police Community

  • Like 2

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Member Achievements


I'm the opposite.

Civil partnership is redundant now - it was a false instrument created to try and appease homosexuals and religious orthodox practitioners.

Marriage equality now caters for all.

Marriage does not have to mean a religious service.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Member Achievements


Civil partnerships in France are for hetero and homosexual couples, and I believe that they are quite a popular option for heterosexual couples.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Member Achievements


In France, if you marry you have to have a civil ceremony (usually at the town hall ). A separate church service, purely ceremonial, is up to the couple . A lot of heterosexual couples do have civil partnerships to deal with legal issues, especially if children are involved as French inheritance laws are interesting to say the least.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Member Achievements


I am really confused by this, I really cannot understand why we make such a song and dance of issues like this in our country?

If you in a gay relationship and wish to marry do so, if your in a straight relationship and wish to make things more formal with the person you love then you should be able to have a civil partnership.

Regardless of sexual prefrences you should be able to choose what suits your believes and values the best. Is it really that difficult we are supposed to be a civilised and tolerant  society.

  • Like 3

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Member Achievements

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

About us

Police Community was originally founded in 2014 by two serving Police Officers.

In 2016 it was incorporated as a limited company called RAW Digital Media Limited and then purchased 3 other forums; Police Specials, UK Police Online and Police UK to form the largest policing discussion forum network in the UK.

Get in touch

  • 20-22 Wenlock Road, London N1 7GU
  • contact@rawdigitalmedia.co.uk
  • 0844 357 0111
  • Forums In Our Group - Police.Community - UKPoliceOnline.CO.UK - PoliceSpecials.COM - PoliceUK.COM



    Meet The Team

  • Chief Bakes
    Chief Bakes Management
  • Chief Rat
    Chief Rat Management
  • Chief Cheetah
    Chief Cheetah Management
  • Rocket
    Rocket Global Moderators
  • David
    David Global Moderators
  • Devil
    Devil Global Moderators
  • MindTheGap
    MindTheGap Global Moderators
  • Sir Penguin
    Sir Penguin Global Moderators
  • Remmy
    Remmy Global Moderators
  • Fedster
    Fedster Global Moderators